Quality Monitoring Fieldwork Design in Multiple Countries: Moving To A Model For More On-Time Monitoring of Fieldwork Salima Douhou, City University of London New CSDI initiatives for consideration Tim Johnson, University of Illinois at Chicago, Beth-EllenPennell, University of Michigan, and Lars Lyberg, Inizio   Translation and Translation Tools When offering a translated version is not enough: Hispanic monolinguals’ device use and web literacy: Implications for web survey design and testing Alisú Schoua-Glusberg, Research Support Services Assessing the impact of different German-language translations of ESS Round 3 items on the resulting data Dorothée Behr, GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Experiment for testing questionnaire translation methods in the European social survey (ESS): Ask the same question versus more adaptive approaches Brita Dorer, GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Asking Moses to help with translation verification Yuri Pettinicchi, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy (MPISOC)   Evaluating Data Quality and Identifying Fraudulent Cases During and After Fieldwork Usage of a method for ex-post identification of falsifications in cross-cultural context Natalja Menold, GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Identifying fake interviews in a cross-national panel study Michael Bergmann, Technical University of Munich, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) Monitoring the evolution of the fieldwork power: Illustration based on the seventh round of the European Social Survey Caroline Vandenplas, KU Leuven Effects of fieldwork delay on subjective wellbeing results due to seasonality in the 4th European Quality of Life Survey Eszter Sandor, Eurofound “Curbstoning”: case study of an elaborate interviewer falsification scheme and new procedures to prevent interviewer fabrication Frederic Malter, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy (MPISOC) Using timestamps for the evaluation of data quality Gijs van Houten, Eurofound   Innovative Uses of Technology & Tools A geographic analysis on literacy in multilingual and multicultural contexts Suehye Kim, UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning Optimizing interactive voice response data quality: Lessons learned from Bangladesh, Tanzania & Uganda Abigail Greenleaf, Johns Hopkins University The DGML R Package: Documenting and generating multilingual questionnaires with explicit reference to a XML structure Dominique Joye, FORS, University of Lausanne CAMCES tool demo Silke Schneider, GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences   Web Surveys Device switching: What we learned from web survey logins Gina Cheung, University of Michigan Where do web surveys work? A multilevel meta-analytical approach to determine country-level impact on response modes Jessica Wengrzik, GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences   Interviewers in 3MC Surveys Do bilingual interviewers perform differently than monolinguals? Emilia Peytcheva, RTI International Interviewer effects in a multilingual face-to-face survey on financial behavior: Evidence from Zambia Markus Frölich, University of Mannheim Planning and evaluation of a doorstep training initiative for bilingual interviewers at the U.S. Census bureau Patricia Goerman, U.S. Census Bureau   Comparative Measures in 3MC Research Using experiments to reducing comparison error in crossnational surveys with special focus on question wording Tom W. Smith, NORC at the University of Chicago Measuring total net household income in interviews of crossnational social surveys with an emphasis on comparative research Uwe Warner, University of Giessen, Germany Measuring labour status in interviews of cross-national social surveys with an emphasis on comparative research Jürgen Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, University of Giessen, Germany   Synergies for Europe’s Research Infrastructures in the Social Sciences (SERISS) Design and recruitment of a probability based cross-national online survey (CRONOS) panel Elena Sommer, City University London The use of sampling frames in European studies Annette Scherpenzeel, Economics of Aging, Technical University of Munich The Translation Management Tool (TMT) used for a survey applying the TRAPD model: The example of the European social survey (ESS), Round 8 Brita Dorer, GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences   The Data Harmonization Explosion: New Developments from the Field Validity and comparability of the educational attainment measure in OECD PIAAC study Silke Schneider, GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Applying ex-post harmonization of corruption items from cross-national survey projects Ilona Wysmulek, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences Item-level controls for ex-post harmonization of crossnational survey data: Theoretical arguments and empirical illustration Kazimierz M. Slomczynski, CONSIRT at The Ohio State University and the Polish Academy of Sciences Self-identification of occupation in web-surveys: Respondents choice between autosuggest and search tree Kea Tijdens, University of Amsterdam/AIAS Harmonization of the minority status: Case of the Russian speaking minority in the former Soviet states Olena Oleksiyenko, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences   Response Style Bias Item attributes as drivers of acquiescent response style Rachel Davis, University of South Carolina Classifying acquiescent respondents: convergence or divergence of categorization approaches? Sunghee Lee, University of Michigan   Cross-cultural Survey Guidelines and Short Courses: Update New and expanded cross-cultural survey guidelines Beth-Ellen Pennell, Julie de Jong, Jamal Ali, University of Michigan   Questionnaire Development Maximizing questionnaire design in cross-national and crosscultural surveys Tom W. Smith, NORC at the University of Chicago The longer, the better? Selection of appropriate crossnational indicators of response quality in open ended questions Katharina Meitinger, GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Ingroup bias and its implications for using visual images in computerized surveys Sunghee Lee, University of Michigan   Interview Privacy Measuring third-party presence during face-to-face interviews: Respondent and interviewer predictor effect on reporting sensitive attitudes in Jordan and Turkey Julie de Jong, University of Michigan Cross-national establishment survey about interview privacy practices Zeina Mneimneh, University of Michigan   Advancing 3MC Survey Research and Other Topics The effect of respondent commitment on response quality in two online surveys Kristen Cibelli Hibben, University of Michigan 3MC project management Peter Ph. Mohler, COMPASS Advancing 3MC survey research Tim Johnson, University of Illinois at Chicago Lars Lyberg, Inizio